Previous Philosophical Transactions:
- JP Callaghan on Lithium Pharmacokinetics
- Lithium in Scottish Drinking Water with Al Hatfield
- M’s Experience with Potatoes-by-Default
- Jon on One Year Post-Potato-Diet
- Neoncube on The Meat and Veggies Diet
- Adam Mastroianni says “please squirt lemon juice on my brain”
- Leo on Swamp Taters
- JV on Explorations of Isotonic Brine Space
This account has been lightly edited for clarity, but what appears below is otherwise the original report as we received it.
From April 21 of this year until today (August 5), I’ve been on a potatoes-by-default diet. This was inspired by the email by M (Philosophical Transactions: M’s Experience with Potatoes-by-Default). In that time, I went from a weight of 173.0 pounds to a weight of 155.4. I’m giving myself a slight handicap, because I actually started the diet about two weeks earlier and my weight was ~180, but I didn’t track my meals or get a digital scale until the 21st and my analog scale was unreliable. Depending on how robust you want to be about it, I’ve lost 17 or 24 pounds in 107 or 121 days. About half of that weight loss was concentrated in the first few weeks, but I kept it off and continued losing over the rest of the diet period.
The most interesting thing I have to say about this is that I have nothing interesting to say. My experience matches what I expected from reading this blog and other sources. I’ve lost weight, and noticed no adverse health effects. That made me almost not want to share here, but it’s important to share replications!
The Details
Here are the eccentricities of my particular case:
1. The diet variation I chose.
I chose “potatoes by default” because I was interested in testing it, and because my social life puts me in group meal settings regularly. And then I added sauce because I had some sauce in the fridge I was hoping to use up. Initially I was going to discontinue the sauce after finishing it up, but I realized it wasn’t adding very many calories and I was curious whether it would affect the diet. My usual meal was a bowl of potatoes with roughly 2 tablespoons of sauce for dipping.
My favorite sauces after four months include the Zesty Secret Sauce by Marie’s, the Creamy Buffalo Sauce by Sweet Baby Ray’s, and the Gold BBQ Sauce by Kinder’s. Sometimes I would add some everything bagel seasoning and melted butter to the buffalo sauce – absolutely amazing!
One question discussed on the blog has been whether some ingredient serves as a blocker, and these sauces contained a whole lot of supposed blockers, which I think is interesting data. The percent of my meals with/without potatoes was inconsistent over the course of the diet, but sauce with potatoes was a constant, so if there’s a complete potato-diet-effect blocker, it wasn’t in the sauces.
I cooked the potatoes by cutting off the skin, cutting them in half or thirds depending on the size, and baking them in the oven on parchment paper at 425 for around 70 minutes. Potato varieties used were mostly russet and gold, sometimes red, and “baby” varieties if they were on sale.
The rest of my diet was very standard – all the normal-American-diet ingredients that might be blockers were involved, and there was no particular portion control beyond not eating when I was full.
2. Exercise.
I don’t believe exercise played a substantial role in the weight loss, but I had two exercise habits going on during this experiment and I did lose weight, so it’s worth reporting on them.
First, I walked a minimum of 10,000 steps each day, although that actually undersells the average (15,313).
Second, roughly 10 times during the experiment period, I played dance video games (DDR or Just Dance) for a minimum of 2 hours at a relatively intense difficulty mode. These mostly happened in the first two months, and were discontinued for personal reasons and not for diet or health-related reasons.
“I Could Never Do That,” Said The Person Who Never Tried
Some friends I discussed this diet with said they were interested, but could never do it, because they get cravings for specific foods when they’re hungry. I find this absolutely unpersuasive. The rules I followed let me have snacks when I got cravings; I still lost weight, and the cravings were less common than before the potato diet.
Some people in previous experiments writing on this blog noted that their desire to have junk food largely subsided while in “potato mode”. It was pretty easy for me to control what I ate at home. But sometimes I would be outside the house, and I would be a little bit hungry and get a small meal at a restaurant, and then I was in trouble! Because if I ate something small, I suddenly found myself hungry for dessert too. But if I didn’t eat out, and I went about my day, I would be perfectly happy not following that impulse.
At any rate, if you’re going to follow any diet, potato dieting is about as close as a diet can be to Pareto optimal: (e.g. it’s better in every possible way than any diet you compare it to)
- It’s easy to do. The rules are simpler than any other diet; the shopping is simpler; the meal prep is simpler.
- It’s easy to stick to; it’s the only diet I’ve ever kept for more than a week. My experience with other diets is that you are constantly thinking about the food and fighting cravings for other food. For some reason, a potato diet doesn’t create that for me, especially with the leniency of “-by-default.”
- It’s less expensive than any other diet. I spent roughly $500 a month less on groceries over the period, despite eating the same proportion of my meals at home.
No Grand Conclusion
Ultimately, this is an N=1 replication. There were times when I ate better and times when I ate worse. I didn’t always lose weight when I was having non-potato meals, but if I gained weight (e.g. on travel) I would quickly lose it again when going back to potatoes. This feels like the “lipostat” hypothesis to me; eating a lot of potatoes did something to make my set point weight lower than it otherwise would be.
I’m happy to have lost weight and even happier to be able to provide a tiny bit more data in support of the potato diet.

M’s report dates back to Dec. of 2022. Do we have any updates since then? I’m curious if the weight creeps back even if one continues to eat the potato-heavy diet.
LikeLike
M says:
I’ve pretty much entirely reverted to a regular diet now. It was much easier to do potatoes by default when I was working from home every day up until the end of 2022 as I had more time to prepare potatoes, etc. Potatoes served in restaurants/in takeout generally come in the form of fries or other oil-drenched preparations, so it’s much harder for me to get the amount of “whole” potatoes I want. I now basically just eat the way I did before potatoes by default, but I’ll generally try to order a “whole potato” dish at a restaurant if I do see one (it’s not that common). Potatoes are now probably <5% of my diet and have been for the last year and a half. I very noticeably feel myself overeating regularly again, which isn't a great feeling and I wish I had more time to prepare potatoes.
My weight fairly rapidly bounced back to about 94% of my starting weight in the couple of months after my potato consumption dropped off (vs. a trough of ~89% right before I stopped eating potatoes by default), but has since been fairly stable around that level for the past year or so. It is not clear to me whether the "permanent" ~5% reduction in weight is a lingering side effect of the potato diet or just a coincidence. My weight at the time of starting potatoes by default in mid-2022 was not unusually high relative to history (see the charts in my original post) so I don't think it is just a "starting point" effect. However, I would also be a bit surprised if eating potatoes by default for 3-5mo would have lingering effects on weight 1.5y later. I guess potatoes by default having such a large effect size in the first place was also pretty surprising, so who knows.
LikeLike
Thanks go out to “M” for the detailed update.
LikeLike
Have you seen this paper?
Potato Chips and Potentially Toxic Lithium Level
Sumaiyah Sadaf, MBBS,a,* and Yassir Mahgoub, MDb
Published: August 19, 2021
”No medication interactions or changes in renal clearance were noted to explain this significant variation. With further exploration, it was discovered that she used to snack daily on 1 to 2 10-oz bags of potato chips at home, while this was infrequent in the hospital.”
”Thus, an increase in the [Na1]/[Li1] ratio in distal tubular fluid arriving at amiloride-sensitive channels may account for suppression of lithium ion transport4 and vice versa. Thomsen et al5found this correlation valid in experiments wherein the clearance of lithium ion was found to be suppressed at lower dietary content of sodium and potassium.”
LikeLike
This seems like the opposite of the lipostat hypothesis to me. If the author’s lipostat or set point had been changed, I would expect the author’s wait to remain stable (rather than increase) while traveling or after stopping the diet.
Gaining weight shortly after going off potatoes (e.g. while traveling) is exactly how all other calorie restriction interventions behave, and implies that their set point is exactly the same. Am I missing something? (genuinely curious – no snark here)
LikeLike
Part of the hypothesis is that while potatoes crank the lipostat *down*, some factor or combination of factors in the typical modern diet cranks it *up*. Thus it isn’t necessarily surprising that the lipostat wouldn’t stay down after it’s no longer being actively pushed down.
LikeLike
So interesting, thanks for sharing!
It looks like M specified that about 1/3 of their meals were potatoes. Did AS say what fraction of meals (or calories, food volume, etc) were potato?
LikeLike